<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chicken and the Egg Social Media Conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/</link>
	<description>Social Media Strategy Blog Social Media Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting Started in Legal Blogging: Selling Door-to-Door &#171; Shatterbox</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-50602</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting Started in Legal Blogging: Selling Door-to-Door &#171; Shatterbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-50602</guid>
		<description>[...] We talked through the full gamut of mandatory technical levers &#8212; keyword research, SEO, SEM, linking strategies, search-optimized content &#8212; but kept coming back to the same conclusion: There are no shortcuts. It&#8217;s about hard work and building credibility post by post, comment by comment, response by response. What Jay Baer described as &#8220;hand-to-hand combat for eyeballs.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We talked through the full gamut of mandatory technical levers &#8212; keyword research, SEO, SEM, linking strategies, search-optimized content &#8212; but kept coming back to the same conclusion: There are no shortcuts. It&#8217;s about hard work and building credibility post by post, comment by comment, response by response. What Jay Baer described as &#8220;hand-to-hand combat for eyeballs.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: microMARKETING Requires Bayonets, Not Grenades &#124; MarketingTypo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-49425</link>
		<dc:creator>microMARKETING Requires Bayonets, Not Grenades &#124; MarketingTypo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-49425</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m a big fan of this notion of reach following relationships. Brian Solis talks about brands &#8220;earning their audience&#8221; and I wrote a post about it called The Chicken and the Egg Social Media Conundrum. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m a big fan of this notion of reach following relationships. Brian Solis talks about brands &#8220;earning their audience&#8221; and I wrote a post about it called The Chicken and the Egg Social Media Conundrum. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaybaer</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-49051</link>
		<dc:creator>jaybaer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-49051</guid>
		<description>Now I HAVE to keep writing. Thanks very much for the comment. Glad you  
liked that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I HAVE to keep writing. Thanks very much for the comment. Glad you<br />
liked that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Rock</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-49050</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-49050</guid>
		<description>Great post Jay. I&#039;m constantly cautioning the companies that I work with that social media has to change the way you approach contact with the client.
I tell that that to be successful they need to put in a lot of time, effort and energy to make it work for them. It won&#039;t be over night, but the long term gains with be worth the work..

Keep writing, and I&#039;ll keep reading.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Jay. I&#8217;m constantly cautioning the companies that I work with that social media has to change the way you approach contact with the client.<br />
I tell that that to be successful they need to put in a lot of time, effort and energy to make it work for them. It won&#8217;t be over night, but the long term gains with be worth the work..</p>
<p>Keep writing, and I&#8217;ll keep reading.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn’s World Weekly News 09 17 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-44551</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn’s World Weekly News 09 17 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-44551</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the reasons I am such an enthusiastic proponent of social media is that I believe it levels the playing field for small business.  In the old days it was virtually impossible to out-spend the big guys.  Today, through social media, there is the opportunity to out-communicate, out-perform and out-wow them – because we don’t have to rely on a gatekeeper to provide access.  Therefore “We now earn the relationships, trust, and reputation we deserve”  great post by @jaybaer &#8211; The Chicken and the Egg Social Media Conundrum [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the reasons I am such an enthusiastic proponent of social media is that I believe it levels the playing field for small business.  In the old days it was virtually impossible to out-spend the big guys.  Today, through social media, there is the opportunity to out-communicate, out-perform and out-wow them – because we don’t have to rely on a gatekeeper to provide access.  Therefore “We now earn the relationships, trust, and reputation we deserve”  great post by @jaybaer &#8211; The Chicken and the Egg Social Media Conundrum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #30Thursday post #3! &#171; Musings on Marketing and other Morsels</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-44545</link>
		<dc:creator>#30Thursday post #3! &#171; Musings on Marketing and other Morsels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-44545</guid>
		<description>[...] In case you wanted tangible proof as to why I admire @JayBaer, read his &#8220;Chicken and the Egg&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In case you wanted tangible proof as to why I admire @JayBaer, read his &#8220;Chicken and the Egg&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott At Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-44468</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott At Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-44468</guid>
		<description>Social media marketing simply creates it&#039;s own form of the mix. 

Simplistict
Strategic
Speed
Standout 


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media marketing simply creates it&#8217;s own form of the mix. </p>
<p>Simplistict<br />
Strategic<br />
Speed<br />
Standout</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marjorie Clayman</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-44466</link>
		<dc:creator>Marjorie Clayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-44466</guid>
		<description>Hi Jay,

I have the rare privilege of being on a somewhat similar wavelength to you. The post that I wrote last night about people who literally plagiarize themselves across various media and channels is one possible result of forgetting what Social Media is all about. Why?

Let&#039;s say I have been getting a good response to my blog. I&#039;ve been working on a series and people have really been getting into the whole concept. I think, &quot;Hmm, I want to capitalize on this, but how?&quot; I decide to weave my blog posts together into a talk, or a webinar, or a book. Very little editing - same essential content that people have already read and responded to.

Because I have been building my community on my blog, I naturally decided to promote my new (fill in the blank) on my blog. People have come to trust me and they want to support me because I&#039;ve built relationships with them, so it seems easy for them to take the leap and buy my book or come pay to watch me speak.

But what will they find when the hear me speak or when they open my book for the first time? They will see the same content they have already read. Maybe even stuff they&#039;ve already commented on.

You are right that technically, you can&#039;t take short cuts in media. But people are trying and they might not even realize it. They are gaming the system that perhaps they helped to create.

I find this very troublesome, and per your post, I think it might be happening because even after the time-consuming effort of building a community, people still forget that that &quot;audience&quot; still consists of individual people. The chicken has forgotten the egg it came from. Or...well, any other way you want to say it :)

Great post. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jay,</p>
<p>I have the rare privilege of being on a somewhat similar wavelength to you. The post that I wrote last night about people who literally plagiarize themselves across various media and channels is one possible result of forgetting what Social Media is all about. Why?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say I have been getting a good response to my blog. I&#8217;ve been working on a series and people have really been getting into the whole concept. I think, &#8220;Hmm, I want to capitalize on this, but how?&#8221; I decide to weave my blog posts together into a talk, or a webinar, or a book. Very little editing &#8211; same essential content that people have already read and responded to.</p>
<p>Because I have been building my community on my blog, I naturally decided to promote my new (fill in the blank) on my blog. People have come to trust me and they want to support me because I&#8217;ve built relationships with them, so it seems easy for them to take the leap and buy my book or come pay to watch me speak.</p>
<p>But what will they find when the hear me speak or when they open my book for the first time? They will see the same content they have already read. Maybe even stuff they&#8217;ve already commented on.</p>
<p>You are right that technically, you can&#8217;t take short cuts in media. But people are trying and they might not even realize it. They are gaming the system that perhaps they helped to create.</p>
<p>I find this very troublesome, and per your post, I think it might be happening because even after the time-consuming effort of building a community, people still forget that that &#8220;audience&#8221; still consists of individual people. The chicken has forgotten the egg it came from. Or&#8230;well, any other way you want to say it <img src='http://www.convinceandconvert.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Great post. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marjorie Clayman</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-44467</link>
		<dc:creator>Marjorie Clayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-44467</guid>
		<description>Hi Jay,

I have the rare privilege of being on a somewhat similar wavelength to you. The post that I wrote last night about people who literally plagiarize themselves across various media and channels is one possible result of forgetting what Social Media is all about. Why?

Let&#039;s say I have been getting a good response to my blog. I&#039;ve been working on a series and people have really been getting into the whole concept. I think, &quot;Hmm, I want to capitalize on this, but how?&quot; I decide to weave my blog posts together into a talk, or a webinar, or a book. Very little editing - same essential content that people have already read and responded to.

Because I have been building my community on my blog, I naturally decided to promote my new (fill in the blank) on my blog. People have come to trust me and they want to support me because I&#039;ve built relationships with them, so it seems easy for them to take the leap and buy my book or come pay to watch me speak.

But what will they find when the hear me speak or when they open my book for the first time? They will see the same content they have already read. Maybe even stuff they&#039;ve already commented on.

You are right that technically, you can&#039;t take short cuts in media. But people are trying and they might not even realize it. They are gaming the system that perhaps they helped to create.

I find this very troublesome, and per your post, I think it might be happening because even after the time-consuming effort of building a community, people still forget that that &quot;audience&quot; still consists of individual people. The chicken has forgotten the egg it came from. Or...well, any other way you want to say it :)

Great post. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jay,</p>
<p>I have the rare privilege of being on a somewhat similar wavelength to you. The post that I wrote last night about people who literally plagiarize themselves across various media and channels is one possible result of forgetting what Social Media is all about. Why?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say I have been getting a good response to my blog. I&#8217;ve been working on a series and people have really been getting into the whole concept. I think, &#8220;Hmm, I want to capitalize on this, but how?&#8221; I decide to weave my blog posts together into a talk, or a webinar, or a book. Very little editing &#8211; same essential content that people have already read and responded to.</p>
<p>Because I have been building my community on my blog, I naturally decided to promote my new (fill in the blank) on my blog. People have come to trust me and they want to support me because I&#8217;ve built relationships with them, so it seems easy for them to take the leap and buy my book or come pay to watch me speak.</p>
<p>But what will they find when the hear me speak or when they open my book for the first time? They will see the same content they have already read. Maybe even stuff they&#8217;ve already commented on.</p>
<p>You are right that technically, you can&#8217;t take short cuts in media. But people are trying and they might not even realize it. They are gaming the system that perhaps they helped to create.</p>
<p>I find this very troublesome, and per your post, I think it might be happening because even after the time-consuming effort of building a community, people still forget that that &#8220;audience&#8221; still consists of individual people. The chicken has forgotten the egg it came from. Or&#8230;well, any other way you want to say it <img src='http://www.convinceandconvert.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Great post. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Burchfield</title>
		<link>http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-marketing/the-chicken-and-the-egg-social-media-conundrum/#comment-44452</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Burchfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convinceandconvert.com/?p=1764#comment-44452</guid>
		<description>The cigarette does the smoking. The chicken is just the sucker. Jay&#039;s deeper message is that if you think social media is a snap, you&#039;re just a sucker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cigarette does the smoking. The chicken is just the sucker. Jay&#8217;s deeper message is that if you think social media is a snap, you&#8217;re just a sucker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 479/485 objects using apc

Served from: convinceandconvert.com @ 2012-02-09 09:19:50 -->
