Speak No Evil – Why Trust Isn’t a 4 Letter Word in Social Media

Now is the summer of our discontent. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. For social media, one hand giveth (instant spread of the Bin Laden news) while the other hand taketh away (seemingly daily stories about a company or person doing it “wrong”).

The most egregious occurrence of late was Rashard Mendenhall (running back for the Steelers, for readers who may not be sports fans) firing off a few tweets that were far outside the boundaries of mainstream American thought with regard to 911, Bin Laden, justice, and so forth. The Steelers disavowed his statements, and Mendenhall eventually apologized.

The belief in decentralized social media and every employee being in marketing is taking root in America. The more companies I talk to, the more I recognize that once they have the official company social outposts humming, organizations want to socialize other parts of the enterprise. This is gratifying, as this is the core premise Amber Naslund and I put forth in The NOW Revolution – that social media is about people not logos, and it’s everyone’s job to represent the company on the social Web.

Trust Is Not a Four Letter Word

speak no evil 300x200 Speak No Evil   Why Trust Isnt a 4 Letter Word in Social MediaBut there’s a huge obstacle preventing many of these companies from executing on this plan. In short, they don’t trust non-marketers to represent the brand appropriately. The people who oversee social media in companies are afraid that other employees will pull a Rashard Mendenhall and do more harm than good, leaving the “professional marketers” to rush in like a bucket brigade to douse the flames and pick through the smoldering ashes of the brand.

I understand the concern, I really do. But, I have two problems with it as an excuse.

First, it contains a substantial amount of unspoken conceit to presume that marketers are inherently better at social media than non-marketers. Social media success is more about being social than it is doing social, and while knowledge of the tools and tactics are helpful, common sense and good judgement is not the sole property of a department, educational or vocational background, or any other circumstance.

I’ve been in meetings and heard these exact words spoken, “It would be great if we had a lot more people active on Twitter, but we’re scared to death to encourage sales reps to set up accounts.” Seriously? These are the same people that communicate for a living, persuading people to part with hard-earned cash to purchase whatever magic elixir you purport to provide. They build rapport and overcome objections for a living, and given that they often do it in a commission-driven environment, they have more at stake in their ability to do so than most marketers ever will.

Second, nobody is disproportionately bad at social media, it’s just that social media missteps are public. Let me give you a challenge. I’d like you to work with your IT department so that you can read all of the emails sent by your employees to non-employees. Not forever, one day should suffice. I guarantee you will FREAK OUT. Your employees are saying all kinds of crazy stuff via email right now as you’re reading this. Insensitive. Poor grammar. Too salesy. Not salesy enough. It’s all there for you to obsess over. But you don’t because it’s not easy or culturally appropriate to read all those emails. Or to listen in on phone calls, for that matter.

You don’t think Rashard Mendenhall has been sending wacky emails for years, that if published in a newspaper wouldn’t send alarm bells ringing at Steelers headquarters? Wake up and smell the keyboard.

At least on Twitter you only have 140 characters to give people the impression that you’re stupid. In an email you have limitless space to confirm the notion.

As Amber so succinctly and eloquently says, if your employees aren’t “good” at social media, you don’t have a social media problem, you having a hiring problem.

So when you’re ready to expand your social media program beyond @companyname and get everyone on board, set aside your biases, engage in rigorous training with all participants, and recognize that social greatness can come from anywhere.

pf button both Speak No Evil   Why Trust Isnt a 4 Letter Word in Social Media
Genesis Theme Framework

Convince & Convert Runs on the Genesis Framework

The Genesis Framework, which powers this site, offers a huge selection of amazing designs which can change the way your site looks. They are easy to customize and include layout options as well as custom widgets, so get Genesis now!

Order The NOW Revolution

Social media and technology have changed business forever.

Buy Now
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
FastCashAdvance 5 pts

Thanks sharing this article I think this types of articles very helpful for all types of campaign.

Thanks

Devid

<a href=”http://trustycashadvance.com”>“ Fast Cash Advance”</a>

AngelaCrocker 5 pts

In many ways, this lack of trust goes beyond social media and permeates all aspects of some corporate cultures. I'm thinking of one client employee in particular who will risk her life in traffic and as a pedestrian to be at her desk by 9am rather than travel safely. It seems arriving on time, out of breath and stressed out is better in the eyes of her employer rather than a rested, focused employee who will have the physical wherewithal to tweet with clarity.

DirectResponse.net 11 pts

Why build boundaries to your companie’s social voice? We are in an age where large companies can be seen as just as customer involved as the mom and pop store on the corner.

As you said in your quote…

“These are the same people that communicate for a living, persuading people to part with hard-earned cash to purchase whatever magic elixir you purport to provide.”

If these employees cannot represent your company well enough in 140 characters then they shouldn’t be representing your company.

JudyHelfand 35 pts

Jay,
I know you are traveling to BWNY, but I wrote my thoughts here http://t.co/JrEqbAx. This is a healthy conversation. Thanks. Judy

OnlineBusinesVA 18 pts

Great post Jay! I loved what you have shared and Jeremy too have some good case studies which he has shared here with us. Thanks for the share!

dino_dogan 147 pts

"Social media is about people not logos, and it’s everyone’s job to represent the company on the social Web." I couldnt agree more. But...

I understand the impulse to want to prevent "the people" from engaging in social media, not because they will make public screw ups (they will) and not because they cant be effective (they can) but because they will echo the way they feel about the company. And the way they feel about the company is the way those who listen will feel about the company as well.

And companies know that their employees dislike them (gross generalization but true most of the time) and that dislike will "leak" out to general public.

If you have a company people are proud to work for, say Tom's Shoes, the social media takes care of its self. BP on the other hand needs to pay for good press.

Hope all that makes sense...that my 2 cents on all that :-)

jer979 5 pts

Jay--you may remember our exchange on my blog re: data vs. experimentation

http://jer979.com/igniting-the-revolution/socmedia...

Hoping that gives me some street cred ;-)

Now...just wondering if you are interested in hearing about some successful case studies about how a few companies have "made everyone a marketer?"

I realize it borders on self-promotion, so I won't link here without your permission first...

Best,

Jeremy

JayBaer 188 pts

jer979 Hi Jeremy. Always interested in good case studies.

jer979 5 pts

JayBaer jer979

Thanks! Here's the case study that was written up in SmartBrief. The VP of Marketing has estimated the equivalent of $200k in marketing spend.

http://smartblogs.com/socialmedia/2011/01/14/your-...

Since then, the CEO has quadrupled the investment and we just finished round 2 with 32 "non-marketers" who have become marketers.

Here's one example of what happened already...a lawyer who realized that a contract was a marketing moment.

http://jer979.com/igniting-the-revolution/employee...

Full wrap-up coming. Enjoy. Thanks again for allowing me to share.

(note: I'm impressed...real-time blog comment monitoring on a Sunday...you Never Stop Marketing: www.neverstopmarketing.com ;-)

Have a great one!

askbangladesh 5 pts

Thanks sharing this article I think this types of articles very helpful for all types of campaign.

Here they my software buys sell and IT service website http://www.askbangladesh.com.

geoffliving 219 pts

I long for a time when we don't leap down people's throats for really minor errors. He hath not sinned... Something I am more and more mindful of in my own critiques. Everyone is going to have google scars if they stay online long enough. This is the reality of it. Just like it is in real life. We all screw up now and again.

Neicolec 166 pts

geoffliving I love that! "Google scars!"

JayBaer 188 pts

geoffliving Thanks Geoff. I appreciate that.

markwschaefer 167 pts

I'm not sure I understand your logic. You acknowledge that people write wacky, perhaps embarassing things all day anyway so that is a justification to put it out there in public? How does that make sense? I think this approach -- and Amber's comment about the problem is too simplistic.

Let's look at the Mendenhall example. Yes, he was out of step with mainstream thought. But who isn't to some degree? He was hired to be a great football player, not necessarily to "stay on message" during a news event.. So did the Steelers make a "hiring mistake" because he sends out stupid tweets? No.

Here's another example. I work with somebody who is one of the best sales people I ever met. He is kind of "folksy" maybe even leaning toward redneck. But there is nothing he would not do to serve his customers and he has single-handedly built up this business. Putting this fella in the public social media spotlight 140 characters at a time would be a disaster. Without knowing the context of the whole person, I imagine his tweets would come across as incredibly embarassing. Does this company have a "hiring issue? No.

I think it is matter of common sense and balance. We wouldn;t put everybody into sales role. We wouldn;t put everybody into the glare of the six o'clock news in a PR role. Why would we set an expectation that everybody should have a role in social media? Being adept at social media is NOT EASY.

I'm not disagreeing that compaines should not be proactive and encouraging with the right people at the right time, but encouraging companies to put their people wholesale on to Twitter because they're sending out stupid emails any way doesn;t make sense. The argument is far too simplistic.

A rare disagreement, my friend.

JayBaer 188 pts

markwschaefer You use as your rejoinder an example of ONE GUY who's kind of a redneck, and then pillory ME for a simplistic argument?

I wouldn't expect you to agree with this post, as you're on record - on this very blog - as a champion of the "social media is so hard that only us super-smart marketing people" can be trusted to do it.

The reality is that the majority of people - your customers and your employees, even the rednecks - are ALREADY using social media. You can't keep the genie in the bottle. Whether you want it to be so or not, everyone in every company is potentially a first point of contact.

Consequently, you can either start to hire and train accordingly, and trust these human assets into whom you've presumably invested a great deal of time and money, or you choose to not train them and empower them, and continue to see corresponding social media missteps.

As to Mendenhall in particular, I think you may have misinterpreted the post. The idea is not that you are making a hiring mistake because people send bad tweets or emails. Quite the contrary. My point is that mistakes and weirdness happens all the time, not just in social media, and if you can't trust your people to make the right move most of the time, you have a problem with your hiring.

I fundamentally reject the notion that being adept in social media is inherently difficult. So much of what we consider to be "social media success" is rooted in common sense, kindness, and simple paying of attention. I find it somewhat dubious that you are a college professor, paid to teach people how to do social media - among other things - and yet you are the one suggesting it's beyond the capabiliteis of many people.

Is it just me, or is that a bit of a defeatest attitude?

Neicolec 166 pts

JayBaer markwschaefer In any larger organization, you find people who are good at their job, but you sure wouldn't want them in a customer meeting. Seems realistic to expect that there are also employees who are good at their job, but not at walking an appropriate line when speaking for the company through social media. That may be the exception, rather than the rule. But I wouldn't fire a great developer just because he tends to put his foot in his mouth and so I can't trust him in a customer meeting, or online. I'd just not let him in customer meetings and online.

I think I'm in the middle. I agree with @jaybaer that most people in most businesses can probably participate in social media, and it sure makes it easier to spread the load and gives the business more opportunities. But it definitely makes sense to have internal training and a mentoring/monitoring program. I think you'd want to monitor new employees or those new to social media closely and give them feedback and direction, and reduce the amount of supervision over time as they demonstrate prowess. It's how we handle customer service training. Is this so different? Besides, that training and monitoring gives the business a chance to educate employees about branding and messaging.

Enjoying watching you two spar!

teriel 7 pts

markwschaeferI agree with JayBaer I work with small businesses regularly and what they usually need is a bit of guidance initially in using social media, but after that they do just fine. People will make mistakes in any medium (social media included), but that's part of the reality of life. You're one example may actually do very well on social media, once he's been given some guidelines to follow, in terms of what not to post and what to post. If he also knows that he can check with other people about what he's posting, he might feel supported in that environment and do really well.

oraclenerd 5 pts

Great article.

Trust, it's not limited to social media...sadly.

Most, many, whatever; companies start you off with no trust given whatsoever.

Access to Facebook from work? Nope.

Giving developers access to a development environment? Nope, the DBAs control that. Why? Because you're not responsible enough to manage it yourself, i.e. "We don't trust you!"

It's the day after Christmas, let's have a company wide (start up) phone call and inform 30% that they no longer have a job as of that day. Why not treat them like adults and say...hey, we're struggling, if we don't get this VC money (or whatever), we're going to have to lay-off or furlough some people in 2 weeks. "We don't trust you!" to act in a professional manner...we think you'll sabotage us or whatever. "WE DON'T TRUST YOU!"

From the moment you are hired just about everything a company says to you is "We don't trust you!"

I try to avoid these companies (or I just get fired from them).

Why would social media be any different?

teriel 7 pts

I think what your post speaks to is a short-sightedness on the part of the business in terms of grasping the social nature of social media. Marketers are going to filter social media in terms of their job, which has its strengths and weaknesses, but letting people be social speaks to a depth of human connection which is lacking at times, because so many people are focused on trying to market, they forget they are dealing with people, and not just potential sales.

C_Pappas 96 pts

Question to those who dont 'trust their sales people to say the right things on Twitter...'do you trust your sales people to answer questions about your company and products on a daily basis?' 'do you trust them to solve business problems for your customers and prospects?'

The last company I worked with was extremely scared of social media and I can now look back and say it was definately a trust issue (it went way beyond social media but thats a whole other discussion). Why arent companies trusting their entire company to represent them? We make hiring decisions based on the role and I am mortified when we dont end up showing or illustrating any trust in these people. My company encourages everyone to tweet, blog, comment, share things, participate on LinkedIn - whatever. In fact, if they do not or are not doing enough, we ask them to do more. Nothing is censored and I appreciate the help honestly.

JayBaer 188 pts

C_Pappas Bingo! Social media reluctance is typically rooted in trust and/or resources.

taracoomans 15 pts

HI Jay - I would add to your argument that traditionally trained marketers have their unique set of challenges that makes them sound less human (i.e.: create a call to action with each tweet). And to your point, if you trust people to be the front line and meet and work with your customers, you should be able to trust them to tweet. Sure, they might need training on the tools, best practices and social media culture..but I don't know about you, but I still end up training marketers on these points as well. You can give them grammar and spelling training if you have doubts, but those who aren't in marketing can actually add an authentic genuine voice to social media. Frankly, the one thing that I can't train is good judgement - and marketers do not have a corner market on that...nor do social media peeps, as evidenced by a long string of mistakes.

Thanks for the great post.

JayBaer 188 pts

taracoomans Thanks Tara. Great comment. I agree that marketers may actually have a background that is NOT conducive to authenticity. Hmmmm.

Neicolec 166 pts

Mixed feelings on this. Of course marketing isn't the only one who can "get" social media. I agree that others should be enabled to use social media. But I also agree with @mclellanchris that email is very different than social media. It doesn't reach nearly as many people, normally. I think it makes sense for a company to have a systematic program of educating and mentoring/monitoring employee's social media work, until managers are confident in the employees. That also provides the opportunity to educate employees about how the company is trying to represent the brand. You mentioned that in your post, but didn't address that problem.

In a way, it's a great opportunity. With that kind of process, a company can help many more employees understand the customers, the branding, and how the company reaches its customers.

JayBaer 188 pts

Neicolec mclellanchris No question. I really hope social media becomes a catalyst for greater cross-training in organizations, and disintegration of silos. That may be wishful thinking, but we'll see soon enough.

ChaseSherman 7 pts

Jay, a company I consult for recently hired 5 college interns to manage it's social media presence. I posted an article (http://businesstooligans.com/blog/the-small-busine...) on this exact topic and got a lot of negative feedback from my readership. And rightfully so. I obviously couldn't give the type of explanation you just presented but I think that if there IS someone overseeing what non-marketers are saying, like you say, it seems like the best way to present your company on social networks.

JayBaer 188 pts

ChaseSherman I'm not a big fan of the intern route. If social is the most real-time and most public representation of your company, why would you have your least experienced personnel manage that?

ChaseSherman 7 pts

JayBaer I agree in most cases. However, the company is a startup and doesn't have the man power to manage it themselves. Thus, they have someone within the company overseeing this arm of their operations but the interns are creating the content and posting responses.

Ryan Critchett 40 pts

Jay, I'd like to post some huge comment but I'd essentially be rewriting everything you just said. So, I'll just say, AMEN.

Soulati | B2B Social Media Marketing 659 pts

Just a few points, Jay...Why is the almighty apology acceptable behavior and then everyone breathes a sigh of whatever and gets back to routine? Do you think French former IMF director what's his name can apologize to his wife and make their relationship better, for example, or the Terminator?

The sales force is the number one missing link in social media. They most of all need to develop relationship and community by engaging in social marketing so prospects align with a person and not a product. It's a new opportunity for those in this field to focus on.

JayBaer 188 pts

Soulati | PR I think the world moves so fast that the next thing is upon us before we have time to consider the ramifications of the last thing.

mclellanchris 5 pts

Good post. But that 'hiring problem' doesn't really mean much if you are fully-staffed with low turn-over positions. It could take 5 years or more to re-staff with social savvy peeps. In my humble, I think what you have there might be better described as a 'training issue'. Also, email is effectively 'closed' and not public like social media. People don't share/forward emails like they do with social media comments/posts. I don't know why, but they just don't. It's far more difficult to broadcast to the world via email - you're limited to your address book - whereas on Twitter it's as simple as a click, so not entirely sure that email vs. social is ideal as a comparison between biz comms media.

JayBaer 188 pts

mclellanchris True enough Chris. It is a war of attrition, and training may be the answer for low turnover companies. Thanks for pointing that out. My point wasn't to compare email and social as distribution vehicles, but rather to ask you to reconsider the notion that employees are somehow "good" at email, and "bad" at social.

lauraclick 118 pts

Love the comparison to email. I think you're right - people would freak out at what they see people saying on email. The huge difference is that email is one to one (or a few) and social media is one to many.

I think this issue all boils down to training and guidance. Instead of obsessing over whether your employees can "do" social right, show them the way. Give them guidance, hold their hand, be there to answer questions and help them recover when they do, inevitably, foul up.

I think if we take all the pressure off of social media and quit making every tweet or post being some heavily massaged marketing message, it would be really amazing what happens. I hope more companies take this advice!

JayBaer 188 pts

lauraclick Thanks Laura. I hope you're right.

margieclayman 449 pts

Here is what my experience is showing me.

You have people who completely ignore Social Media for all kinds of reasons. It could be a personal preference thing - I have a couple of friends who bitterly refuse to sign up for Facebook because they don't like forking over their content to another entity...the weirdos :) or it could be fear, as you say. Then you have marketers who use Social Media and who may be really good at it, but their personal skills may be lacking. And then you have people who seem to be great people, but they struggle to meld that with the ability to grow their businesses.

If you want to grow your business, you may or may not need Social Media, depending on how you want to grow, what kind of business you have, etc. If you want to grow your business, it may not matter if you're a reliable, trustworthy person. Look at what Wall Street got away with!

However, I really think that Social Media is going to turn into more than a tool in a marketing toolbox. I think it's going to turn into those 2 oracles from The Neverending Story who can look deep into your soul and tell you what kind of person you are. There are so many temptations. The temptation to do just what will get you more followers. The temptation to run your mouth without thinking, wherever you are. The temptation to be dishonest if it can get you ahead. The temptation to attack.

Ultimately, I hope and think that Social Media will sift out the people who reveal themselves to be less than quality human beings. If this is truly a revolution about people, then we should be learning who the good folks are, right? Maybe that will encourage companies to hire more super quality people or to promote leaders who will do them proud online and offline.

Now that would be one heckuva revolution!

JayBaer 188 pts

margieclayman I largely agree. Social media makes it impossible for companies to hide, and that includes hiding their less than excellent employees. We need to start hiring for passion, and training for skills. One of social's long-term legacies will be changing the way companies look at staffing and talent acquisition.

Ryan Critchett 40 pts

margieclayman I largely agree as well, Margie. Darn! I was hoping we could disagree on something! We still have plenty of time. Bravo on your comment.