THE NOW REVOLUTION

Read The NOW Revolution, the best-selling book on social business from Jay Baer and Amber Naslund.

Every customer is a reporter. Every employee is in marketing. And speed matter like never before. In The NOW Revolution, you'll learn:

- How to build a culture that empowers social
- How to activate your customers and employees
- How to listen and respond to real-time opportunities
- How to manage a social media crisis
- How to effectively measure social media, including ROI

Endorsed by Seth Godin, Chris Brogan, Ann Handley, John Jantsch and dozens of other social media and social business leaders.

Available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Apple and in all hard cover and digital formats. Also, in audio via Audible.

Click here to get the first chapter free.

Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble?

We built our own Frankenstein. We are spending countless employee hours tweeting, retweeting, responding to tweets, figuring out whom to follow, secretly following celebs and athletes, and designing custom Twitter backgrounds.

Nobody forced companies to get involved with their customers in this way. There was no law, edict, or pitchfork-wielding band of angry citizens. We just did it voluntarily. And for what?

Certainly not because of the math.

is twitter worth it for business 1 Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble?A new research study of 1,400 U.S. consumers from ExactTarget and CoTweet (they are clients) called Twitter X-Factors shows that just 5% of Americans follow even one brand on Twitter. By way of comparison, that’s approximately the same size as the Asian American population, and you certainly don’t see the media coverage, software development, conferences, and general hullabaloo about marketing to Asians.

Put another way, the Twitter audience that’s connected to brands is just slightly larger than the population of Illinois. Can you imagine an “Illinois Marketing for Dummies” book? Or CEOs having thoughtful retreats in exotic locales to discuss their “Illinois strategy”?

On the surface, the time and effort we’re spending cultivating our Twitter followings is flat-out ridiculous. But, dig a little deeper into the behavior of the core Twitter audience, and the perspective changes.

Here are a few reasons identified in the study that the focus we put on Twitter may be entirely appropriate, and perhaps not even intent enough:

The Iceberg Effect. The actual reach of Twitter is actually double the user base. Due to embedding of tweets, people scanning tweets but not actually having an account, and tweets being picked up by search engines, 23% of consumers read tweets at least monthly.

Interaction. Customer prefer Twitter as the mechanism to truly interact with brands and learn more about them. Facebook is preferred for information about the brand’s activities, and email is preferred for product updates. Think about that for a moment. Customers follow you on Twitter not to be informed, but to be interacted with. They follow you because you answer back and treat them like an individual, if only for 140 characters. But yet so many companies are using Twitter as a post-modern headline news service. Wrong approach.

Overwhelmingly, respondents in the study prefer interacting with official, branded accounts rather than personal accounts from employees. (think @ford vs. @scottmonty) Consumers believe branded accounts are more reliable and accurate. Twitter gives you the opportunity to make your logo more than a logo, providing compassion, insight, information, and even entertainment in bite-sized chunks. Try that with a press release…

Nowhere to Run. Startling to me, but less than 1% of the participants would use Twitter as the first way they’d contact a company when they need customer service. However, consumers are much more likely to use Twitter as an escalation, meaning the people with whom you’re interacting on Twitter may already be frustrated with your organization.

Said one respondent:

If I don’t get the support I need through phone or email, I use Facebook and Twitter to voice my complaint, since a ton of people will see it. The company can’t ignore me then!”

Influence. The online population that’s creating the content that’s influencing the rest of the world is on Twitter, period. Daily Twitter users are 300-400% more likely to write a blog, review products, upload videos, and every other social behavior, than are non-users.

In fact, the research shows that 72% of daily Twitter users write a blog, 61% write at least one product review per month, and 53% upload videos.

is twitter worth it Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble?

This research raises two interesting questions:

- Forrester published research earlier this year that said Facebook users (rather than Twitter users) were the source of much of the New Influencer population. Which do you believe?

- Even though the numbers are small, is the Twitter effort worth it?

Check out the Twitter X-Factors study here.

pf button both Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble?
About Jay Baer

Jay Baer is a hype-free social media strategist & speaker, tequila guy, and co-author of The NOW Revolution. Jay is the founder of http://convinceandconvert.com and host of the Social Pros podcast.

Thousands of People Get One Social Thing. How About You?

(our free, daily email with 1 great thing you need to know about social and content)

Genesis Theme Framework

Convince & Convert Runs on
the Genesis Framework

The Genesis Framework, which powers this site, offers a huge selection of amazing designs which can change the way your site looks. They are easy to customize and include layout options as well as custom widgets, so get Genesis now!

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

RT @rod_izumi Twitter5%Twitter23% http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @rod_izumi Twitter5%Twitter23% http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @psyji_election: RT @rod_izumi: Twitter5%Twitter23% http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @rod_izumi: Twitter5%Twitter23% http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @rod_izumi: Twitter5%Twitter23% http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

5%RT @rod_izumi: Twitter5%Twitter23% http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @tsubukore: RT @rod_izumi: Twitter5%Twitter23% http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @rod_izumi: Twitter5%Twitter23% http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

Twitter5%Twitter23% http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

Hi Jay,

First time reading your blog; sorry I live in the marketing wilderness apparently...

Its an interesting question and one with a simple answer i believe and that answer is a definite yes it is worth it for enterprise companies especially. I work with one of the top B2B companies in the world and while we were designing their SM strategy two of the key questions we asked are 1)where does the audience live online and 2)where do they expect a market leader to be? The answer to that is the same... everywhere and everywhere.

The learning that most companies are failing to realize is that nothing stands alone anymore; marketing, sales and relationship development is all integrated. When customers look at your brand they experience it based on situation(why i am i coming to you) and channel(where am i coming to you). Further, they see the world not just through their own eyes, but through a reference model based on the eyes of their friends, family, colleagues and network. Situation, channel and reference create one one defining experience that ultimately influences our decisions for everything in life and business. This means marketing strategies must include SM and then the question becomes how and to what scale.

For us, we built a simple road map that quickly interconnects all of the key marketing and relationship touch points that are both expected and preferred by my customer's key target audiences. This included a modest Twitter presence, but far more attention to blogs, micro and customer communities and experiential events.

The other big realization is regarding influence and here is where I don't buy in to your point "The online population thats creating the content thats influencing the rest of the world is on Twitter, period." Let's face it, most of the content on Twitter is pure tripe and regurgitation. Influence is now all around us like the air we breathe; it comes from so many sources and directions, both credible and questionable, that its really hard to track back even personally how and who influenced you at any given time.

Its certain that there is great content on Twitter and obviously a fair number of influencers on Twitter, but to make a claim like that is a bit myopic. No offense intended. How many authors are actively using Twitter? I would say their books, what our peers are saying about them/their ideas and speaking engagements are far more influential.

Further, I think we really over estimate our own influence as marketers or thought leaders (if we are claiming that title). Do we have more influence over a man than his wife or co-worker? Nope. Do we have more influence over that woman buying Tide than that carefully constructed packaging and messaging? Nope! I think we tend to think we are more important than we are because a very small fraction of the world enjoys what we have to say.

So is Twitter useful for business? Yes. But so are advertising, events, online, Direct Mail, and all the other ways to connect with people now. The trick is always how and that is different for every company.

Sorry to go on but hey, I'm a marketer...

Great post though and excellent discussion.

Cheers!

Jeff - Sensei

Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://ow.ly/2pdva

Thoughts? Can we just be glad people are interacting with our brands without trying to formulate a numeric hypothesishttp://lnkd.in/6TtGg4

Love this: "the Twitter audience thats connected to brands is just slightly larger than the population of Illinois. Can you imagine an Illinois Marketing for Dummies book? Or CEOs having thoughtful retreats in exotic locales to discuss their Illinois strategy?"

I do have an "Illinois strategy"!

Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://bit.ly/acNK1I Imagine an Illinois Marketing for Dummies Book?

The Twitter audience thats connected to brands is just slightly larger than the population of Illinois. http://bit.ly/cYOELe #socialmedia

twittertwitterIs Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble | social crm | http://ow.ly/2oIGK

It's surprising to me to learn that facebook users are setting trends more than twitter users. Social media is such a great way to reach customers right away. I was thinking twitter would be the stronger spot for customers and conversions, interesting stuff! Thanks for a great article!

J. Souza
SocialMediaMagic.Com

Interesting article for sure. That's amazing.. that person said "I'll complain here, they can't possibly ignore it!"

I align with the fact that Twitter is definitely used the wrong way by most people, like you said, for headlines and so forth.

I see, based both on the fact that people are getting fed up with robot posts AND influence by Google in their new "social ranking factors", that people are becoming more "how to use Twitter" conscious.

Ultimately, I think that Twitter is awesome, if you consciously cultivate great relationships with high quality people that are important to you and your business, and for the purposes of good old human connection.

I think Facebook users definitely are the influencers. There are more options to express a playful attitude and to.. do other stuff on Facebook!

At any rate, great article, as usual.

Twitter is part of a broader category of social marketing. A major trend that is very evident and will continue to increase is the use of social media to attract leads and potential customers. Tools such as Customer Relationship Management (CRM) put the customer in the center of daily operations and allow for a 360 degree view of the client. SocialCRM is a way to combine traditional front office processes (such as email marketing, lead qualification, forecasting, opportunity management, etc.) with social marketing avenues like Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

Good read. However I do use, and appreciate twitter for the information/links provided rather than the CB style tweets. I focus on the real information shared. Those post-modern headline news tweets can provide useful infomation from restaurants like kogibbq, and journalists like Henry Blodget.

RT @rod_izumi 企業やブランドのTwitterアカウントをフォローしている人は全米人口のわずか5%。だが、Twitterユーザーは、意見や感想を積極的に発信し、消費者の23%に影響を与え得る存在でもある、という話。 http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @rod_izumi 企業やブランドのTwitterアカウントをフォローしている人は全米人口のわずか5%。だが、Twitterユーザーは、意見や感想を積極的に発信し、消費者の23%に影響を与え得る存在でもある、という話。 http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @psyji_election: 激しく同意 RT @rod_izumi: 企業やブランドのTwitterアカウントをフォローしている人は全米人口のわずか5%。だが、Twitterユーザーは、意見や感想を積極的に発信し、消費者の23%に影響を与え得る存在でもある話。 http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

激しく同意 RT @rod_izumi: 企業やブランドのTwitterアカウントをフォローしている人は全米人口のわずか5%。だが、Twitterユーザーは、意見や感想を積極的に発信し、消費者の23%に影響を与え得る存在でもある話。 http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @rod_izumi: 企業やブランドのTwitterアカウントをフォローしている人は全米人口のわずか5%。だが、Twitterユーザーは、意見や感想を積極的に発信し、消費者の23%に影響を与え得る存在でもある、という話。 http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

5%の牽引層が市場を作り出している!RT @rod_izumi: 企業やブランドのTwitterアカウントをフォローしている人は全米人口のわずか5%。だが、Twitterユーザーは、意見や感想を積極的に発信し、消費者の23%に影響を与え‥ http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @tsubukore: RT @rod_izumi: 企業やブランドのTwitterアカウントをフォローしている人は全米人口のわずか5%。だが、Twitterユーザーは、意見や感想を積極的に発信し、消費者の23%に影響を与え得る存在でもある、という話。 http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

RT @rod_izumi: 企業やブランドのTwitterアカウントをフォローしている人は全米人口のわずか5%。だが、Twitterユーザーは、意見や感想を積極的に発信し、消費者の23%に影響を与え得る存在でもある、という話。 http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

企業やブランドのTwitterアカウントをフォローしている人は全米人口のわずか5%。だが、Twitterユーザーは、意見や感想を積極的に発信し、消費者の23%に影響を与え得る存在でもある、という話。 http://bit.ly/b4YPKu

Is Twitter for business even worth the trouble? http://ow.ly/2sB3u

Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://bit.ly/bG6jfz

Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? - "...just 5% of Americans follow even one brand on Twitter." http://ow.ly/2uJq8

#twitter #business #marketing #socialmedia Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble?, http://bit.ly/cYOELe

Yes, you are correct by thinking it is about depth and interaction. I see it as a means to an end. While there is a lot of support for social media currently the fact remains that there are businesses out there that still think it's nonsense. While some companies have embraced the notion others have completely ignored it. These companies (the ones ignoring) want to see the bottom line, the numbers, and most importantly the money. They are the ones that have been doing the same stuff for 30 years and don't see any ROI with social media. They don't want to hear about interaction, depth, holding hands and singing songs. There is a huge bias when it comes to social media and business. At least in my neck of the woods. It is still not a proven platform, which is a shame.

STUDY: A study found that 5% of Americans follow brands on Twitter -- roughly equivalent to the population of Illinois http://ht.ly/2qt2Q

RT @jaybaer: Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://bit.ly/cFN0WX

Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://bit.ly/bI8Oo2 @jaybaer, like your blog, just came across it recently. well done.

interesting numbers to review RT @jaybaer: Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://bit.ly/cFN0WX

RT @jaybaer: Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://om.ly/rFpS

Just a note to remind everyone that this networking does work. I just closed business on a networking referral.... http://fb.me/FoEqZYLB

Is it working for you? RT @jaybaer: Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://zoo.mn/9CgfvN

Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://ow.ly/2sk5J

Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? - http://bit.ly/cFN0WX

Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble | from @jaybaer - the #'s are small, but is Twitter worth it? http://ow.ly/2sa6F

Understanding the power of Twitter means getting past the numbers http://bit.ly/9JhPKn

RT @yycsocmed: Understanding the power of Twitter means getting past the numbers http://bit.ly/yycsm150 (from @jaybaer)

Twitter for business could work really well, if the company's Twitter correspondent truly interacts as the positive force for the company. In my experience, one large corporation proved to me their brand is better than competition. @suntimes is a Chicago newspaper. Whomever is running social media/Twitter is right on! The other brand of Chicago newspaper lacks that. If I retweet and article, or mention a post, I will always get a response. @suntimes lets me know they are there, and listening.

The moral of this story to me is this. If you are going to have a Twitter for your business, you must allow the resources to manage it. There is no easy follow. You can't expect to have a "base" and that we stay interested when you ignore people.

RT @jaybaer: Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? http://bit.ly/cFN0WX

Why do we tweet? Its certainly not because of the math http://bit.ly/cFN0WX (via RT @jaybaer)

@ChipHanlon Ppl prefer Twitter as the mechanism to truly interact w/ brands & Twitter's reach is double yr follower base http://j.mp/bIOGAH

Trackbacks

  1. [...] using Twitter to further endorse their brand is worth the time. To read the full blog post, visit Convince & Convert, Jay Baer’s [...]

  2. [...] Source: Is Twitter for Business Even Worth the Trouble? [...]